• Energy
    • Wind Power
    • Hydroelectric
  • Self-Consumption
    • Wind
    • Photovoltaic Solar
    • Storage
    • Microgrids
    • Biogas
    • Hydrogen
  • TECHnPower
    • Wind Turbines
      • nED100
    • Energy Storage
      • Battery Energy Storage Systems
      • Power converters
  • Services
    • Decarbonization
    • Energy Engineering
    • EPC Energy
    • Operation & Maintenance
    • 24/7 Control Centre
    • Monitoring & Control
  • En
    • Es
    • Gl

< Back | 3 February 2020

Regulation for integration

Interview to Pedro Linares. “A well-designed market will result in an optimal and massive investment in renewables.”

Following the 2020 editorial line, this month we are dealing with a regulatory challenge: how to adjust the market to a 100% renewable system. So, we have interviewed Pedro Linares, Professor at ICAI Engeneering School and Director of BP Chair for Energy and Sustainability. 

Is the present regulatory framework of the electrical market compatible with a 100% renewable system?

In theory, it could be compatible, but in practice it would be difficult. An energy-only market like the present one could indeed be compatible with the development of a low variable cost and variable production energy, such as renewable energy. But in this scenario, the demand must play a more active role and risks should be eliminated with long-term contracts and back-up energy. The problem is that, due to a lot of reasons, demand will not play that role, so the intervention of a regulator will be necessary to create energy, capacity or flexibility markets in the long-term.

What regulatory changes would be a priority to make the transition easier?

The main regulatory change is to establish well-designed capacity markets to guarantee the recovery of profitable investments in renewables and back-up capacity. In this report, we describe possible alternatives, being the reliability options the ones with the best qualities. In any case, a basic element is that markets should allow the participation of the demand to provide the system with the necessary services.

A well-designed market will result in an optimal and massive investment in renewables, provided they are more competitive than fossil energies, including the cost of CO2 equivalent, of course. If this cost is not well internalized, an additional support mechanism should be needed.

Should the electric market change from a marginal model to any other alternative model to stimulate the development of renewable projects? Do you have any proposal?

I think that what is necessary is a modification not a change, as the marginal market has a lot of advantages in comparison to other more regulated systems, for example: its compatibility with the European market. With the abovementioned suitable modifications, the market will be able to stimulate the development of profitable renewable energies.

And, finally, what regulatory mechanisms could be taken into consideration to encourage the development of energy storage projects?

In my opinion, the best regulatory mechanism would be a well-designed market. This market will transmit the suitable economic signals, both in energy retribution, steady capacity or flexibility. So, the investment in storage will answer the needs of the system and will be paid for that. Furthermore, it will allow different storage technologies, including demand-response, to compete or complement each other, if necessary.

However, if we want to encourage non-competitive emerging technologies to try and reduce their costs by creating markets, then, a tender of this kind of technologies would be advisable, once again, including also the demand possibilities.

References

  • Economics for Energy | Some thoughts on capacity markets
  • Economics for Energy | Energy roles: capacity markets
  • IIT Comillas | Report: the future Spanish electric system: challenges and policies

Want to read more? Click for the following challenge: demand management.

Are you interested in this challenge? Read the interview to another expert on the adaptation of the energy market.

Pedro Linares

Pedro is a professor of Industrial Organization at ICAI, Director of the Cátedra BP de Energía y Sostenibilidad, co-founder and Director of Economics for Energy. He is also a researcher at the Technological Research Institute and Associated Researcher at MIT CEEPR. Now, he is also Director of the International PhD School of Universidad Pontificia Comillas. His interests cover several subjects, most of them connected with a broad idea of sustainability, understood as a comprehensive concept covering economics, environment, social capital, innovation and justice.

Share: Facebook Mail Linkedin Twitter
< SW for complementary simulations of technical regulations Case study of complementary simulations of technical regulations >
  • Energy
    • Wind Power
    • Hydroelectric
  • Self-Consumption
    • Wind
    • Photovoltaic Solar
    • Storage
    • Microgrids
    • Biogas
    • Hydrogen
  • TECHnPower
    • Wind turbines
      • nED100
    • Energy Storage
      • Battery Energy Storage Systems
      • Power converters
  • Services
    • Decarbonization
    • Energy Engineering
    • EPC Energy
    • Operation & Maintenance
    • 24/7 Control Centre
    • Monitoring & Control
  • Norvento
    • Get to know us better
    • Our team
    • Sustainability
    • Innovation
  • Work with us
    • Your career at Norvento
    • Talent Scholarship Scheme
  • Communication
    • Press room
    • Blog
  • Contact us
  • Visit us
  • CIne, our headquarters. Zero Energy Building
  • Linkedin
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • © 2025
  • R&D Projects
  • Legal notice
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookie policy
  • Whistleblower Channel
En
  • Es
  • Gl
  • Energy
    • Wind Power
    • Hydroelectric
  • Self-Consumption
    • Wind
    • Photovoltaic Solar
    • Storage
    • Microgrids
    • Biogas
    • Hydrogen
  • TECHnPower
    • Wind turbines
      • nED100
    • Energy Storage
      • Battery Energy Storage Systems
      • Power converters
  • Services
    • Decarbonization
    • Energy Engineering
    • EPC Energy
    • Operation & Maintenance
    • 24/7 Control Centre
    • Monitoring & Control
  • Norvento
    • Get to know us better
    • Our team
    • Sustainability
    • Innovation
  • Work with us
    • Your career at Norvento
    • Talent Scholarship Scheme
  • Communication
    • Press room
    • Blog
  • Contact us
  • Visit us
  • CIne, our headquarters. Zero Energy Building
Gestionar consentimiento

At Norvento Enerxía we use our own and third-party cookies for different purposes: performance, security and analytics. You can customize your preferences through the configuration panel, as well as obtain additional information about the processing of your data, including the exercise of your rights, by consulting our Cookies Policy.
You can change the settings at any time by returning to the dashboard, clicking on a different option, and refreshing the web page. 

Technicals Always active
Analítica
Preferencias
El almacenamiento o acceso técnico es necesario para la finalidad legítima de almacenar preferencias no solicitadas por el abonado o usuario.
Statistics
El almacenamiento o acceso técnico que es utilizado exclusivamente con fines estadísticos. El almacenamiento o acceso técnico que se utiliza exclusivamente con fines estadísticos anónimos. Sin un requerimiento, el cumplimiento voluntario por parte de tu proveedor de servicios de Internet, o los registros adicionales de un tercero, la información almacenada o recuperada sólo para este propósito no se puede utilizar para identificarte.
Marketing
El almacenamiento o acceso técnico es necesario para crear perfiles de usuario para enviar publicidad, o para rastrear al usuario en una web o en varias web con fines de marketing similares.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
Set my preferences
{title} {title} {title}